Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance v. Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ellerin, J.

This appeal requires us to determine whether plaintiff insurer has a duty under the commercial general liability insurance policy held by defendant operator of a nationwide chain of automobile parts and service stores to defend and indemnify defendant in an action alleging that defendant sold used and old car batteries as new ones to unsuspecting consumers. We hold, upon analysis of the scope of the coverage of the policy, construed under Pennsylvania law, and of the allegations in the underlying complaint, that plaintiff has no such duty. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Mutual Benefit Insurance v. HaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Town of Massena v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Barron Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eplus Group, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API