Legal Opinion

Hargis v. Standard Oil Co. of Indiana

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1956No. Term 56-F-11PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scheusteman

Plaintiff, Harold Hargis, obtained judgment on a verdict of $3875 for injuries incurred while delivering oil products at the bulk plant of the defendant, Standard Oil Company of Indiana, in Centralia, Illinois.

On this appeal the defendant contends it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, on the grounds that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the defendant was not proved guilty of any negligence which proximately contributed to plaintiff’s injury, and plaintiff had assumed the risk. In the alternative, it is contended a new trial should be ordered because the verdict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Murphy v. Illinois State Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Packard v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Coken v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Deckert v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Dade County Board of Public InstructionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Crum v. Gulf Oil Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Provence v. DoolinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Lewis v. HULL HOUSE ASSOC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Barry v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API