Legal Opinion

State v. Crank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 1997No. 76,508, 76,509PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Larson, J.:

This consolidated appeal involves the interpretation of a new criminal drug statute which replaced a prior statute. In separate criminal actions, Jason Anthony Crank and Alan Eugene Pilcher, who both had previous convictions for possession of marijuana, were charged with felony possession of marijuana under K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 65-4162(a). However, their earlier convictions were both under amended versions of K.S.A. 65-4127b(a).

The trial court ruled in both cases that a prior conviction of possession of marijuana under 65-4127b does not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Public Employee Relations Board of the Kansas Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. RoudybushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local No. 64 v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. KeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. George v. Capital South Mortgage Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. UnruhSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API