Legal Opinion

MacEvitt v. Maass

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1901Published

Action by a physician and surgeon to recover for services. Motion for a new trial on the minutes by the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff, a physician and surgeon, was called in by the defendant to treat his wife. He made an examination of her, and informed the defendant that a surgical operation was necessary. They entered into an agreement that the plaintiff should perform it for $75. The trouble was an internal one somewhere in the abdomen. The plaintiff testified that a day or two later he made another examination of the patient and found conditions which were entirely new to him, and foreign to the surgical operation which he had proposed; that the first diagnosis was entirely wrong; that her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Van Allen v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API