Legal Opinion

Dowdy v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPakkee, J.

Tbe plaintiffs’ assignments of errors Nos. 1 to 4, both inclusive, which relate to questions asked witnesses by plaintiffs’ counsel, objected to by tbe defendants, and not answered, have not been set out in the plaintiffs’ brief. They are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Dillingham v. Kligerman, 235 N.C. 298, 69 S.E. 2d 500.

Tbe remaining assignments of errors Nos. 5 and 6 are founded on exceptions challenging tbe rulings of tbe court below in allowing tbe motions for judgments as of nonsuit against all tbe plaintiffs, and tbe judgments signed in accord…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Hampton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BlackwelderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API