Legal Opinion
Arnold Parks v. Shinseki
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 3, 2013No. 2012-7089PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the denial of service connection for Mr. Parks’ asserted medical conditions. A. 1-5. Discerning no reversible error, this court affirms.
I
Mr. Parks served in Vietnam from 1964 to 1966. A. 2. Along with 6,000 other soldiers, Mr. Parks volunteered for a then-classified project called “Project 112.” Id. Mr. Parks participated in a part of Project 112 called Shipboard Hazard Defense (SHAD). A. 119. As part of his participation, the United States government intentionally exposed him to three chemical warfare agents.
In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Comer v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Tommie P. Butler, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Sickels v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Rizzo v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Durden v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Ouida Wise v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Toomer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- James A. Nohr v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- McCleary v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.