Legal Opinion
Max Axelrod v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1963No. 15043_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, District Judge.
This appeal from the decision of the Tax Court of the United States 1 turns upon the interpretation of Section 166(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, Title 26 U.S.C. As best we can determine, this is the first cause directly calling for judicial construction of this section, 2 which provides as follows:
“§ 166. Bad debts—
****#»
“(f) Guarantor of certain noncorpo-rate obligations. — A payment by the taxpayer (other than a corporation) in discharge of part or all of his obligations as a guarantor, endorser, or indemnitor of a noncorporate obligation the proceeds of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Axelrod v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Imel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Payte v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
- Coors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Goss v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.