State v. Pulphus

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

The defendant, Evelyn K. Pulphus (Pul-phus), appeals from a Superior Court jury conviction of obtaining money from another by means of false pretenses in violation of G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 11-41-4. 1 In support of her appeal, Pulphus raises the following issues: (1) the State failed to lay a proper foundation for bank surveillance photographs introduced at trial, and (2) identification testimony was based on an impermissibly suggestive photographic array. We affirm.

We will first recite the facts that were established at trial. In the late morning hours of August…