Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Dumler (In re Cassidy)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1992No. Nos. 91-1180, 91-1244PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment by the district court denying priority in bankruptcy to an exaction under Internal Revenue Code Section 72(t). The district court, affirming the bankruptcy court, concluded that the assessment was a “penalty for a nonpecuniary loss,” and thus not entitled to priority under Section 507(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Appellants Cassidy and the United States raise two issues on appeal; whether the IRS’s assessment of a 10 percent exaction on the premature withdrawal of pension plan funds pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 72(t) is a “tax” or a “penalty”;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. City of New York v. FeiringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Simonson v. GranquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. United States Department of the Treasury—Internal Revenue Service (In re Bradford)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  2. In Re CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API