Legal Opinion

Rainsford v. Temple

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 10, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Rosa E. Rainsford against Thomas J. Temple. From an order of the general term of the city court (21 H. Y. Supp. 1039) affirming an order of the special term adjudging defendant guilty of contempt in disobeying the injunction contained in an order for his examination in supplementary proceedings, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.

This appeal brings up the question whether a judgment debtor, who has been served with an injunction order in supplementary proceedings, may dispose of subsequently acquired property while the injunction order is in force. It is not claimed that the money received by the defendant after the service of the order had been previously earned by him, but the decision is sought to be upheld on the broad ground that after the service of the ordinary injunction in supplementary proceedings the judgment debtor can make no disposition of money subsequently earned or borrowed or received as agent, while…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Trustees of the Board of Publication & Sabbath School WorkNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mandelbaum v. DanzigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Protter v. Lovell, New York County Courts1915
  5. McBreen Realty Co. v. VogelCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API