Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. City of Chattanooga Firemen's & Policemen's Insurance & Pension Fund Board

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 18, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

Responding to a petition for a writ of certiorari to the City of Chattanooga Firemen’s & Policemen’s Insurance and Pension Fund Board, the chancellor decreed full pension benefits to plaintiff in lieu of off-duty benefits awarded by the Board. Employing statutory certiorari review, the chancellor conducted a trial de novo and determined plaintiff had established by a preponderance of the evidence that he had suffered an on-the-job injury.

The action of the Board was subject to review by a common law writ of certiorari since the agency was acting in a judicial or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cooper v. Williamson County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Davison v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Levy v. State Board of Examiners for Speech Pathology & AudiologyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cooper v. Alcohol CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. County of Shelby v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. Preston v. Burlington City Reitrement SystemSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. County of Shelby, A Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee v. John R. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. Maddox v. Co. of LoudonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Pardue, Jr. v. Metro Gov'tCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API