Legal Opinion
In Re a Special Investigation No. 237
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 1983No. 533, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
It is highly unlikely that the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Attorney General’s Office or the Baltimore City Grand Jury working with that Unit was ever concerned with a self-contained and parochial larceny that occurred in Prince George’s County; yet the argument of the appellee Hospital would have it so. Why should the appellee do this? Obviously, because it suits its purpose to do so, and it suited its purpose very well when a judge of the Criminal Court of Baltimore bought that argument. As a result, the judge issued an order on March 14, 1982, refusing to compel compliance on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McBurney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 224Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Greco v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986