Legal Opinion

Levovsky v. Horvitz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

These five cases were consolidated for trial and referred to an auditor, who filed a single report. In the Superior Court motions to recommit the report filed by Max Levovsky and George Levovsky were denied, and motions for judgment filed by the Union Malt Products, Inc., and Horvitz were allowed. The cases are here on exceptions to the denial of the motions to recommit and to the granting of motions for judgment.

Max and George Levovsky were brothers. For several years they had been engaged in the liquor business, which they conducted first as individuals and then through a corporation, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Cutter v. GilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Kirkley v. F. H. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Lopes v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nerses Tookmanian v. FanningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Reil v. Lowell Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. MyKulak v. CollinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API