Legal Opinion
Poulos v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 520719 (Jun. 24, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 24, 1992No. 520719Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
ISSUE
Should the defendant's motion to strike the second, third and fifth counts of the plaintiff's complaint be granted?
FACTS
On November 7, 1991, the plaintiff, Thomas Poulos, filed a seven-count complaint against his former employer, Pfizer, Inc. (hereinafter the "defendant") and Pharmchem Laboratories, Inc. (hereinafter "Pharmchem"). Plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for wrongful discharge, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, invasion of privacy, defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The plaintiff's complaint alleges the following facts: in the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.