Legal Opinion
Petersen v. City of Mesa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 25, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0016Published
1Opinion of the Court
63 P.3d 309 (2003)
204 Ariz. 278
Craig W. PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF MESA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 1 CA-CV 02-0016.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.
February 25, 2003.
Skousen, Skousen, Gulbrandson & Patience, P.C. By David L. Abney, Mesa, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee.
City of Mesa Attorney's Office By Rosemary H. Rosales, Catherine M. Bowman, Mesa, Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant.
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
¶ 1 Craig W. Petersen, a firefighter for the City of Mesa, challenged the constitutionality of the random testing component of the City's proposed Substance Abuse…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.