Legal Opinion

Hybertsen v. Reimann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is an action brought against the accommodation makers of three promissory notes. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff.

Mr. and Mrs. L. E. Klumpp sold certain property to Hallmark, Inc., taking back three corporate notes secured by a second mortgage. The notes were also signed by defendants as individuals to provide the Klumpps with additional security. Hallmark, Inc. became bankrupt and the property securing the notes was assigned to the trustee in bankruptcy. Plaintiff purchased from the trustee in bankruptcy a two percent…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gavin v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Reimann v. HybertsenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pitrolo v. Community Bank & Trust, NAWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API