Legal Opinion

Mimnaugh v. Partlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Peter Partlin contracted with the plaintiff to cut, cure, and put into stack a certain quantity of hay at the agreed price of §15.

The defendant refused to pay the plaintiff for his work after he had finished his job, alleging as a reason that the work was so negligently done that the hay was nearly worthless.

*392The plaintiff was a farmer residing in the township of Greenfield, in the county of Wayne, and the defendant lived in Detroit. Failing to receive his pay, he sued the defendant therefor before a justice of the peace in the city. The suit was commenced on the sixteenth of August. On the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Ives & M'Carty v. Van Epps & ShattuckNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Grant v. ButtonNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  4. La Farge v. HalseyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
  5. Huntoon v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Leslie v. MollicaMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Secor v. SiverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Watkins v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API