Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zimmer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1989No. 89-CA-0222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 919 (1989)

Stuart A. SMITH

v.

Julius ZIMMER, et al.

No. 89-CA-0222.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

November 16, 1989.

Brian J. Waid, Bubrig, Scandurro & Waid, Buras, for plaintiff-appellant Stuart A. Smith.

Gregory J. Lannes, Jr., Chalmette, for defendant-appellee La. Dept. of Transp. and Development.

Before GARRISON, KLEES and BECKER, JJ.

KLEES, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment in favor of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). We affirm, but for reasons other than those given by the trial court.

This case arose from a collision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardy v. State, Through Dept. of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Robertson v. HandyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Garrison v. State, Through Dept. of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Guillotte v. Dept. of Transp. & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Durrett v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maeder v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Loyd v. City of RustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Dicapo v. City of OpelousasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API