Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ferebee v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1914PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cooke, J., at March. Term, 1914, of Waee, in an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries.

1ConcurrenceWalker, J.

This case was before us, 163 N.C. 351, when we directed a partial new trial, restricted to the single issue of damages. The first and second exceptions, because the trial judge submitted no other issue, need not be considered.

The third and fourth exceptions are that Dr. Richardson, who had qualified as an expert, was permitted to testify, while the plaintiff was being examined and exhibited to the jury: "This place up here, (indicating) on the neck is the most serious injury of the two, and apparently has been produced by some force coming from a point above this place of injury, carrying the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jeffress v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Ferebee v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Herndon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Godfrey v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Patrick v. . TreadwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. . FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API