Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett

Mullins was indicted, tried and convicted for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. From this offense he was given a fine of $500 and a 6 months confinement to the County Workhouse. He has seasonably appealed, briefs filed and able argument heard. We now have the matter for disposition.

There are various assignments of error hut principally the contention is that the Highway Patrolmen who served the search warrant were not authorized to do so unless some County officer was present when this warrant was executed. Obviously if the search is illegal then the evidence found thereunder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albright v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Bragg v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Vickers v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Winger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Hewitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API