Legal Opinion

Murray v. Briggs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1902No. 4225PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County. — Hon. Keane: H. Budkin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

This suit was brought by respondent against appellants to recover possession of certain real property in .Kittitas county, together with alleged accrued rents and profits for the use and occupation thereof. In the complaint'it is alleged, in substance, that at the time of the entry of the judgment in favor of respondent,’ and of *247making the sale thereunder, hereinafter mentioned, one John A. Shoudy was, and for several years prior thereto had been, the owner in fee of the following described premises in said county, towit, lots 6 and 7 in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Packwood v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Moody's Heirs v. MoellerTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Furman v. DewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Finley v. FinleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Peck v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Engstrom v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Humphries v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Adamson v. Black Rock Power & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API