Legal Opinion

Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1985No. BE-467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

In this appeal of a workers’ compensation order awarding a lump sum payment to the claimant, the employer and carrier contend the record lacks competent substantial evidence that the award is in the claimant’s best interests. We agree and reverse the order.

In seeking lump sum payment, the claimant, who planned to relocate to Alabama, submitted expert testimony as to an invest-mént plan that would allow him to meet monthly expenses. The expert, Mr. Scano-lon, said that claimant needed approximately $2,000.00 per month to meet his needs. His current resources included $865.00 per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cone Bros. Contracting v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Court of Flags v. OutlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Herndon v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. Sanford v. ALACHUA COUNTY SCHOOL BD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Edgewood Boys' Ranch Foundation v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Collins v. F & J FixturesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Boynton Landscape Co. v. DickinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Brandt Bakery Supplies v. ChristmasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API