Legal Opinion

Pennebaker v. Chamber

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 6, 1971No. 18453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*67OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a civil rights' complaint against Arthur Potter, Justice of the Peace, Clair Barnett, storekeeper, and Carl C. Chambers, a Pennsylvania state trooper.1 The district court refused to permit plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis and on its own motion also dismissed his complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), which is part of a section entitled “Proceedings in Forma Pauperis,” the district court may dismiss an action if it is satisfied that the action is “frivolous.” We think the action against the Justice of the Peace was properly dismissed…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert David Figueroa v. Audrey P. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Clark v. ZimmermanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Garvey v. CassonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  4. Lovell v. ArnoldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Pitt v. CoxeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API