Legal Opinion
Starr v. Starr
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 3, 1934No. 169PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The plaintiff, sister of the defendant, and his invited guest in an automobile driven by him, sued the defendant for personal injuries sustained as a result of the automobile sliding and skidding and running off the road and striking a culvert.
The defendant demurred to the second and third counts of the declaration.
The material part of the second count is as follows:
«* * * yet the defendant not regarding his duty in that behalf, did not use due and proper care that the plaintiff should be safely carried by the said automobile, but wholly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. SindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Williams v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Wallace v. Keystone Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Campbell v. WalkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Slack v. Premier-Pabst Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Thompson v. CoolesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Biddle v. Haldas Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.