Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cain v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 25, 2002No. S02A1332Published

1DissentGarley, Justice

Because Cain was convicted by a jury, he had an absolute right to file a timely direct appeal. Smith v. State, 266 Ga. 687 (470 SE2d 436) (1996). Compare Wheeler v. State, 269 Ga. 547 (499 SE2d 629) (1998) (guilty plea); Syms v. State, 240 Ga. App. 440 (1) (523 SE2d 42) (1999) (guilty plea). However, he did not do so. Instead, he filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal which was untimely because it was premature. According to the majority, “Cain’s motion for out of time appeal should be deemed as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal. . . .” Majority opinion, p. 786. In my opinion,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Gillen v. BostickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Hasty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API