Legal Opinion

Cox v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2009No. 07-16812PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Steve Michael Cox appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment and orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005) (failure to state a claim); Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003) (failure to exhaust); Rene v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc., 305 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc) (summary judgment). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Cox’s conspiracy allegations against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. (PC) Florence v. KernanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (PC) Gebrezgie v. PhillipsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Johnson v. TorresDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Oliver v. TingleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. (PC) Oliver v. TingleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API