Legal Opinion

Dimmitt v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1929No. 28,722Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.;

The action was one to recover under an alleged burglary insurance policy. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appeals. The chief question presented is whether the policy covers the loss, the defendant contending it does not.

The original policy is submitted for our examination. It shows that it is the standard residence burglary policy except that it bears a rider containing the clause “on the highway.” It contains a schedule which enumerates the location of the residence of the insured; that it is private; occupies the entire building; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. German American Insurance v. DarrinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Nichols v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Kansas Amusement Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Hunley v. Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API