Legal Opinion

Brock v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 4, 1989No. 22413-86; 26201-86; 29998-86; 34227-86; 21731-87UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW BROCK, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Brock v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 20145-85; 20318-85; 21799-85; 866-86;2

22413-86; 26201-86; 29998-86; 34227-86; 21731-87

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-641; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 641; 58 T.C.M. (CCH) 826; T.C.M. (RIA) 89641;

December 4, 1989

Declan J. O'Donnell, for the petitioners.

J. Anthony Hoefer, for the respondent.

FAY

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FAY, Judge: This case was assigned to Chief Special Trial Judge Marvin F. Peterson pursuant to section 7443A(b) of the Code 3 and Rules 180, 181,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel B. Nickeson and Enid C. Nickeson Norman E. Kuhl and Nancy J. Kuhl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Edwin C. Kubler, Jr. And Betty Kubler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Olsen v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API