Legal Opinion
Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1726PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
Before the Court is the plaintiffs motion [46] for spoliation sanctions against the defendant Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Upon consideration of the plaintiffs motion [46], the defendant’s opposition [55], the plaintiffs reply [59], the defendant’s surreply [62], the arguments presented by both parties at the motion hearing held on January 28, 2015, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court will DENY the plaintiffs motion for spoliation sanctions.
Two possible explanations exist for EPA’s conduct…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ground Saucer Watch, Inc., Harvey Brody v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Montgomery v. RisenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hall & Assocs. LLC v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hall & Associates v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Mannina v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.