Legal Opinion

Hanover Logansport, Inc. v. Robert C. Anderson, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1987No. 71A03-8607-CV-00179Published

1Opinion of the Court

512 N.E.2d 465 (1987)

HANOVER LOGANSPORT, Inc. and Spatz & Company, Appellant (Defendants below),

v.

ROBERT C. ANDERSON, Inc., Appellee (Plaintiff below), James Dettling, d/b/a Discount Liquors, Applicant for Intervention.

No. 71A03-8607-CV-00179.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.

September 10, 1987.

Robert J. Palmer, E. Spencer Walton, Jr., May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, for appellant.

David A. Rosenthal, Rosenthal, Greives & O'Bryan, Lafayette, for appellee.

STATON, Judge.

Hanover (defendant below) appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss.

We reverse.

Hanover is the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API