Legal Opinion

AT&T Communications and Sedgwick CMS v. Victoria Murray Rosso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D16-3971Published

1Per curiam

The Employer/Carrier (E/C) in this workers’ compensation ease challenges the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) award of claims for authorization of lawn care, home renovations, attendant care for at least four hours per day, and an evaluation and treatment by a podiatrist together with the authorization of a custom AFO brace and an evaluation of the need for specialized shoes. We affirm the award for lawn care because competent, substantial evidence (CSE) supports the JCC’s finding that such care will improve Claimant’s compensable conditions of depression and anxiety. See Delong v. 3015…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aino's Custom Slip Covers v. DeLuciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Diamond R. Fertilizer v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. DeLong v. 3015 WEST CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Timothy Bowser Const. Co. v. KowalskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Schafrath v. Marco Bay Resort, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API