Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cox v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1994No. 18350, 18351Published

1DissentMiller, Chief Justice

I dissent. In my opinion, Department, the circuit court, and the majority have failed to give proper deference to Board’s decision.

1. Adler’s grievance was not filed in a timely manner.

I agree that Department erred in finding District had waived its defense of failure to timely file grievances, but dissent as to the majority’s conclusion that both grievances were filed in a timely manner.

The record indicates Cox filed her grievance within thirty-five days of her discovery that District gave credit for nonteaehing experience and that she had received no credit for her prior non-teaching…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dunker v. Brown County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Moran v. Rapid City Area School District No. 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dale v. BOARD OF ED., ETC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mortweet v. ETHAN BD. OF ED., DAVISION CTY.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API