Legal Opinion
DiSabatino v. New Castle County
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided August 22, 2001No. 12714PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
In this action, which was commenced on September 10, 1992, the plaintiffs, Peter and Cindy DiSabatino (the “DiSabatinos”) and Daniel and Maureen Dominelli (the “Dominellis”), seek injunctive relief and money damages against New Castle County (the “County”). Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to compel the County to issue building permits for two parcels of land that they own, plus attorney fees and costs. At issue is whether the County may validly rescind its earlier decision resubdi-viding the lots that the plaintiffs purchased. That rescinded authorization was the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commercial Properties, Inc. v. PeternelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Miller v. Board of Adjustment of Dewey BeachSuperior Court of Delaware · 1986
- Life of the Land, Inc. v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Allen v. FolsomCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cribbin v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Cribbin v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Hyetts Corner, LLC v. New Castle CountyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
- Ocean Bay Mart, Inc. v. The City of Rehoboth BeachCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
- Ocean Bay Mart, Inc. v. The City of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.