Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hardy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1986No. 85-6474PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants (“the Intervenors”) appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions to file late claims to the assets of an equitable receivership, and their motions to file late objections to the Receiver’s categorization of their claims. On appeal, the appellants contend that the district court abused its discretion in denying their motions and entering judgment against them. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
This case involves a receivership resulting from an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Wayne Burton and various entities he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Theodore Delusignan, Movant-Appellant v. R.N. Gould, Receiver-TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Arizona Fuels Corporation and Eugene Dalton, President, Tenneco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. An-Car Oil Company, Inc., Cyrus W. Partington, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arkansas Loan and Thrift CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Dickinson v. Universal Service Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities And Exchange Commission v. Robert HardyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986