Mitchell v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER *
BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Louis P. Mitchell, appearing pro se, petitions for review of the Tax Court’s November 6, 2006, memorandum opinion explaining its reasons for granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. Because Mr. Mitchell is pro se, we have construed his pleadings liberally. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam). Having determined that we lack jurisdiction over the petition for review, we dismiss it.
I
In October 2004, Mr. Mitchell filed a petition in the Tax Court seeking review of a notice of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fleming v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Eric N. Umbach v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph D. Specking v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Berrey v. Asarco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Myers v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- David Myers v. Cmsnr. IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019