Legal Opinion

Hardin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1977No. 53864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendants were convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. Defendants prior to arraignment made demand for a list of witnesses and a copy of the indictment. A copy of the indictment which contained a list of witnesses was furnished after the call of the case for trial. No motion for continuance or mistrial was made and defendants then *796announced ready. As each state witness was called defendants objected on the grounds that they had not been furnished a list of witnesses pursuant to their demands prior to the call of the case. The objections…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Haupt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chezem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Serna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Bone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Silverstein v. SilversteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API