Hardin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
The defendants were convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:
1. Defendants prior to arraignment made demand for a list of witnesses and a copy of the indictment. A copy of the indictment which contained a list of witnesses was furnished after the call of the case for trial. No motion for continuance or mistrial was made and defendants then *796announced ready. As each state witness was called defendants objected on the grounds that they had not been furnished a list of witnesses pursuant to their demands prior to the call of the case. The objections…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Haupt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chezem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Serna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Bone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Silverstein v. SilversteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978