Legal Opinion

Charles Oran Mensik and Mary Mensik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 17, 1964No. 14167_1PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

This case is before us on petition of Charles Oran Mensik and Mary Mensik, his wife, for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States. Mensik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 37 T.C. 703 (1962).

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent, assessed petitioners a tax deficiency of $547,967.55 for the taxable year ending December 31, 1956, and a fifty per cent penalty for fraud of $273,-983.78, as provided in Section 6653(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U. S.C.A. § 6653(b). 1

The decision of the Tax Court ordered petitioners to pay…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Mensik v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. John F. Kurnick and Celia Kurnick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Etta Potson Bodoglau, Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Potson, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Habersham-Bey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Meier v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Professional Services v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Sidney Kreps v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Chester D. Tripp, Chester D. Tripp, Surviving Spouse Etc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API