Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith J.

Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor," and lias .appealed.

It is. first insisted that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. But we do not agree with counsel in this contention. The State’s case was made by a young man named T. E. McCullough,who testified substantially as followsj He and his father, W. E. McCullough, owned together a small mercantile business in the city of Blythe-ville, and on one occasion a salesman who sold and installed gum machines came into witness ’ place of business and went to work on some of his machines. The salesman was in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Casteel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. AbelesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alldread v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Lemons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API