Legal Opinion

B.W.C. v. A.N.M.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 16, 1991No. 1901005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether the Court of Civil appeals erred in holding that a final order of adoption cannot be set aside after the lapse of five years from the date of entry, even if the action to set it aside is brought within five years. Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10-5(c), in effect at the time this proceeding was commenced, provided as follows:

“(c) A final order of adoption made and entered by a probate court shall not be annulled, avoided, set aside or impaired after the lapse of five years from the date thereof because of any irregularity, infirmity or defect…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Parker v. Fies & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Downtown Nursing Home, Inc. v. PoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Hillier v. City of East HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Muller v. ThautNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shepard v. Sanofi US Services Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API