Legal Opinion
(PC) Gray v. Alvarez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 4, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02401Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID GRAY, No. 2:24-cv-2401 DJC CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LUPE ALVAREZ (F.M.), et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion for remand is before the 18 Court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for remand should be granted. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On September 3, 2024, defendant E. Martinez filed a notice of removal to federal court 21 under
28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a) and 1446, and a request for screening. (ECF No. 1.) In the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.