Mitchell v. State ex rel. Williams
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, DONALD K., Judge.
Two of the respondents in receivership proceedings have appealed from an order entered by the Circuit Court for Leon County denying their petition for a priority as to certain reinsurance proceeds.
The basic question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether that court erred in such denial in view of the appellants’ contention that the reinsurance contract was for their benefit as the original insureds.
The appellants, Imperial Polk Leathers, Inc., and Saddle Creek Properties, Inc., both hereinafter referred to as “Imperial,” were among the groups of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- First National Bank of Kansas City v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Hunt v. New Hampshire Fire Underwriters' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Globe National Fire Insurance v. American Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. HechtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Clark and Co., Inc. v. Dept. of Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971