Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Riddle (99-3405) Lavance Turnage (99-3406) Bernard Altshuler (99-3439)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2001No. 99-3405, 99-3406 and 99-3439PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Bernard Altshuler, Jeffrey Riddle, and Lavance Turnage were convicted by a jury of RICO, RICO conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) & (d)), and conducting an illegal gambling business (18 U.S.C. § 1955), and Riddle and Turnage of committing a violent crime in furtherance of racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1959). They appeal on several grounds. They argue that the district court erred when it permitted them to be absent during voir dire, and they attack their RICO and violent crime convictions on the grounds that there was an insufficient connection with…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. John F. Gardiner (05-1247) Ronald Lupo (05-1248)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API