Legal Opinion

Gebhart v. Hunter

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 16, 1950No. 1413 H. CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, Chief Judge.

Comparatively narrow, but nonetheless difficult, questions are presented in this habeas corpus proceeding. No factual controversy exists.

Petitioner, an inmate of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, has now served a 20 year sentence, less credit for statutory and industrial good time. Most of the basic facts with reference to his incarceration are shown in United States v. Gebhart, D.C., 70 F.Supp. 824. The first and second counts of the indictment under which he was tried and convicted, however, are shown in the margin.1

*337The several questions will be discussed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holiday v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Holbrook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  5. Holiday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GebhartDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
  2. Robinson v. SwopeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API