Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Pence

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by John L. McCullough against Harvey L. Pence to recover one-sixth interest in certain royalties. From an interlocutory judgment ordering an accounting, and from a final judgment on the referee’s report, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The complaint in this action alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of a one-sixth interest or share in certain letters patent, and that defendant had the right of sale under said letters patent upon payment of certain royalties, one-sixth of *987which belonged to plaintiff, and that defendant had made large sales of . patented articles, and had made a payment to plaintiff on account of his interest; that the amount of sales was unknown to plaintiff, but that the plaintiff has been informed and believed that they have been very extensive; that an account had been requested, but the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Brown v. Saratoga RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. McCargo v. . JergensNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Everett v. De FontaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Harle v. BrennigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Lindner v. StarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API