Floyd v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
Nathan C. Floyd appeals the summary denial of his motion and supplemental motion for postconviction relief from his conviction for sexual battery. In his motion, he sought, among other things, a new trial based upon his alleged discovery of new evidence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A); 9.140(b)(1)(D). Because the record does not conclusively show that Mr. Floyd is not entitled to relief, and the nature of the alleged newly discovered evidence warranted an evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand. We affirm the denial of Mr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Riechmann v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Barrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Poff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abner Zambrano v. State of FloridaFlorida Fourth District Court of Appeal · 2026
- JAMES M. LECLAIRE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018