Legal Opinion
Holzemer v. Urbanski
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1999No. 1998-1291PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 129.] HOLZEMER, APPELLEE, v. URBANSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Holzemer v. Urbanski,
1999-Ohio-91.] Constitutional law—Full faith and credit doctrine requires that Ohio give to those acts, records, and judicial proceedings of another state the same faith and credit as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from which they are taken—Section 1738, Title 28, U.S.Code, and Section 1, Article IV, United States Constitution, applied. The doctrine of full faith and credit requires that the state of Ohio give…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lane v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bloomfield v. BeierOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Sanford v. 202 Racing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011