Legal Opinion
Kuhlman v. Water, Light & Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 13, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Suit for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff's petition alleges that during the year 1917 the Brunswick Light Water Company built transmission lines from Brunswick to Keytesville, by way of Dalton, Missouri, for the purpose of transmitting electric current from Brunswick to Keytesville and Dalton, to supply the inhabitants of said towns and persons living along the route of said lines with electric current for lighting and mechanical purposes; that said Brunswick Light Water Company entered into an agreement with plaintiff and her husband wherein said company agreed to furnish a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- McGrath v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Roscoe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State ex rel. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Montgomery v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Skelly Oil Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Sanders v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Bennett v. Royal Union Mut. Life Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.