State v. Hodge
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction upon trial to the court without a jury of possession of a narcotic drug, heroin. Former OBS 474.020. One of the issues presented on appeal is whether or not the state established a sufficient chain of custody of the narcotic allegedly found on the defendant. There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the state did not, and a discussion of it is not warranted beyond noting that the principle involved is dealt with in detail in State v. Anderson, 242 Or 368, 409 P2d 681 (1966), and State v. Winslow, 3 Or App 140, 472 P2d 852 (1970).
The other issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. WinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Andrews v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- State v. RaymondCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. DelkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. AshkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976