Legal Opinion

Becker v. Bundy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1929No. 27,247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action to rescind a contract for the exchange of farms was submitted to the trial court upon a stipulated statement of facts. The court rendered judgment rescinding the contract, and defendants appealed therefrom.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. Plaintiff A. W. Becker owned a farm of 240 acres subject to a mortgage. Defendant Bundy owned a farm of 320 acres subject to two mortgages. Defendant Lewis is the cashier of defendant State Bank of Madelia. Plaintiffs and defendant Bundy entered into a written contract, drawn by defendant Lewis, for the exchange of farms pursuant to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Werner v. RawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Thomas v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Dickinson v. LawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. North Star Center, Inc. v. Sibley Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Norris v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API