Legal Opinion

Lustig v. Congregation B'Nai Israel

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam T. Cowin, J.

This is a motion by a fourth-party defendant to dismiss a complaint for insufficiency before answer, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7). The court is disposed to treat it as one for summary judgment under CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]).

CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]) contains an extraordinary power; the power to treat any 3211 motion as one for summary judgment. The effect of the exercise of such a power is to accord the resultant judgment the same res judicata effect that belongs to a judgment rendered after a plenary trial. ‘ ‘ With such an impact, this ‘ treatment ’ is not to be lightly indulged.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Milk v. GottschalkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lustig v. Congregation B'Nai IsraelNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Weiner v. M. Fortunoff of Westbury, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Theatre Confections, Inc. v. Cate EnterprisesNew York Justice Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API